top of page
Search

The McArthur–Burak Families: A Fight for Truth, Justice, and Accountability

The story of the McArthur–Burak family is one of the clearest illustrations of how Los Angeles County DCFS misuses its power, disregards constitutional protections, and targets innocent families without cause. Their journey began publicly on October 14, 2025, when their first account was published in “Audrey and Marcus McArthur’s Story: A Fight for Family — Our Journey Against Injustice.” The article documented how DCFS arrived at their home twice in a single day without a warrant, without exigent circumstances, and without any lawful basis to intrude on their constitutional rights. The event marked the beginning of a deeply painful and legally significant timeline.


The very next day, on October 15, 2025, the published article “McArthur’s Story: DCFS Continues Harassment” exposed how the County escalated its misconduct through intimidation tactics, misinformation, late-night threats, and repeated pressure to surrender the children without any court order. These events reflected a pattern already known inside Los Angeles County but rarely documented so clearly. https://www.stolenchildrenbycps.com/post/mcarthur-s-story-dcfs-continue-harassment


By October 17, 2025, the pattern could no longer be dismissed as an isolated mistake. In the published article “The McArthur Family Exposes DCFS Misconduct and Ongoing Harassment,” the family released undeniable evidence of false allegations, deceptive statements, and retaliatory behavior by DCFS employees. It became clear that the actions against them mirrored systemic failures that courts had previously warned Los Angeles County about.


Everything culminated on November 13, 2025, when the family published “The McArthur Family: A Line Was Crossed and the Truth Is Now on Video,” showing the moment DCFS officers arrived claiming to possess a warrant that Edelman Children’s Court later confirmed did not exist. The video documented a clear violation of Fourth Amendment protections and demonstrated how DCFS attempted to fabricate justification for a removal that had no legal foundation.


All of these public events, combined with the family’s courage and documentation, now appear in the federal record through four major filings: Dkt 361, Dkt 362, Dkt 363, and Dkt 364. These filings collectively prove that the harm done to the McArthur–Burak family is not an isolated event but part of a long-standing Monell pattern of unconstitutional conduct.


What Dkt 361 Shows

Dkt 361 stands as the foundational federal filing that captures in detailed narrative form the unconstitutional conduct inflicted on the McArthur–Burak family. It documents how DCFS attempted to enter the family’s home on October 29 and November 13 without a valid warrant. The court’s records confirm that on October 29, no warrant existed at Edelman Children’s Court, despite DCFS claiming otherwise. The filing also details how DCFS fabricated mental health allegations, falsely accusing Audrey of schizophrenia even though her psychological evaluation showed no diagnosis and no mental illness. The same evaluation cleared Marcus, showing he had no mental disorder and no unsafe behavior. Dkt 361 includes the family’s proof of completed programs, including Audrey’s parenting completion and domestic violence victim program, along with Marcus’s substance use program records and psychological assessment. DCFS intentionally omitted these documents from its detention report. Dkt 361 establishes the McArthur–Burak events as a continuation of the exact constitutional violations already documented in Patrick v. County of Los Angeles, which the federal court had recognized in prior rulings. It firmly anchors the family’s experience within a broader Monell pattern of fabrication, suppression, and unlawful seizure.


What Dkt 362 Shows

Dkt 362 presents critical corrections to the California Department of Justice criminal history record for Marcus McArthur. This filing proves that DCFS misrepresented Marcus’s criminal history, using outdated and incorrect information to portray him as dangerous, despite the fact that the DOJ had already dismissed, reduced, or cleared the charges years earlier. Dkt 362 includes evidence that the 2014 arrest entries were amended by the DOJ on July 7, 2020. The kidnapping and robbery charges were dismissed in furtherance of justice, the assault charge was reduced to a misdemeanor under Penal Code § 17(b), and the conviction was set aside pursuant to Penal Code § 1203.4a. Dkt 362 explains how DCFS refused to acknowledge the corrected record, failed to verify the DOJ information, and instead used the outdated criminal history to justify a false narrative of danger. This aligns with the same pattern identified in earlier rulings where DCFS fabricated or altered criminal history to mislead courts. Dkt 362 reinforces that the County’s misuse of criminal records is not accidental but part of an ongoing unconstitutional practice across multiple families.


What Dkt 363 Shows

Dkt 363 adds a new layer of significant evidence, focusing on the misconduct of Los Angeles Dependency Lawyers attorney Carolina Villamil. It includes the full written communication sent by Villamil to Audrey. The filing documents that Villamil falsely claimed Audrey was prohibited from sharing information with her designated representative, even though no court order existed. It shows that Villamil threatened contempt without any written order, discouraged the submission of exculpatory evidence, and interfered with Audrey’s constitutional rights to seek help and prepare a defense under WIC § 308(a), WIC § 349, WIC § 827(a)(1)(J), and the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Dkt 363 directly links this behavior to the same Monell pattern of coercion, misinformation, and obstruction described in Patrick, Hernandez, Nicholas, and Schofield cases. It demonstrates how County-appointed counsel collaborates in suppressing evidence, misleading parents, and protecting DCFS from accountability. The filing shows that this misconduct is not historical; it is ongoing, active, and directed at the McArthur–Burak family in real time.


What Dkt 364 Shows

Dkt 364 consolidates the entire evidentiary record from Dkt 199 through Dkt 363, officially establishing the McArthur–Burak family as one of the key examples proving Los Angeles County’s widespread unconstitutional practices. It presents a comprehensive review of twenty-five years of audits showing that Los Angeles County was repeatedly warned about warrantless removals, fabricated reports, the use of unlicensed workers, ADA violations, ICWA violations, MEPA violations, and suppression of evidence. The filing explains that despite decades of notice, the County failed to correct its practices, creating clear Monell liability under City of Canton, Connick v. Thompson, and Long v. County of Los Angeles. The filing also confirms that the McArthur–Burak family is currently in hiding due to DCFS retaliation and intimidation — a direct result of their documentation of unlawful conduct. Dkt 364 emphasizes that their disappearance is powerful evidence that the County continues to violate constitutional rights today. It ties their case to the four other federal civil rights cases involving Los Angeles County DCFS, proving that identical misconduct has been inflicted upon multiple unrelated families. This filing is the most sweeping confirmation yet that the McArthur–Burak family’s experience is not isolated but part of a systemic, entrenched pattern inside DCFS.


Conclusion

From October 14 through November 13, 2025, the McArthur–Burak family made their truth public through published accounts and irrefutable video evidence. Their courage ensured that what happened to them could not be buried, manipulated, or rewritten by DCFS. Each article they released captured another chapter of misconduct, beginning with unlawful entries, escalating into fabricated allegations, and culminating in the exposure of an attempted removal based on a false claim of having a warrant.


Dkt 361, Dkt 362, Dkt 363, and Dkt 364 now preserve their truth in the federal record. These filings prove that the violations against them are part of a larger pattern that spans multiple families, multiple years, and multiple failures across Los Angeles County DCFS. Their story now stands as a central pillar in the fight for accountability and systemic reform.


ree

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page